<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (1) TMI 144 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69992</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals and upholding the assessee&#039;s entitlement to investment allowance and deductions under sections 32A, 80-I, and 80HH of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal concluded that the processes involved in manufacturing arrack constituted manufacturing activity, creating a new commercial commodity, and therefore, qualified for the claimed benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 12:38:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (1) TMI 144 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69992</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals and upholding the assessee&#039;s entitlement to investment allowance and deductions under sections 32A, 80-I, and 80HH of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal concluded that the processes involved in manufacturing arrack constituted manufacturing activity, creating a new commercial commodity, and therefore, qualified for the claimed benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>