<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (7) TMI 204 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69938</link>
    <description>Delay in filing a wealth-tax return may constitute reasonable cause where the delay is attributable to the time taken to file the income-tax return, because the statutory scheme under the Wealth-tax Act linked the filing timelines for the two returns. On that basis, penalty under section 18(1)(a) was held not justified, and cancellation of the penalty was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:19:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (7) TMI 204 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69938</link>
      <description>Delay in filing a wealth-tax return may constitute reasonable cause where the delay is attributable to the time taken to file the income-tax return, because the statutory scheme under the Wealth-tax Act linked the filing timelines for the two returns. On that basis, penalty under section 18(1)(a) was held not justified, and cancellation of the penalty was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>