<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (4) TMI 161 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69933</link>
    <description>Actuarial provision for gratuity was deductible where it was made for the relevant previous year, reflected ascertainable liability, did not exceed the admissible amount, and an approved gratuity fund had been created with the required contribution conditions satisfied. Section 40A(7) generally disallows gratuity provisions, but preserves qualifying provisions, and Explanation 2 makes such deduction available in the year of provision without waiting for actual payment. The distinction between initial liability and incremental liability was treated as irrelevant after section 40A(7), so the departmental restriction on deduction failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:09:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (4) TMI 161 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69933</link>
      <description>Actuarial provision for gratuity was deductible where it was made for the relevant previous year, reflected ascertainable liability, did not exceed the admissible amount, and an approved gratuity fund had been created with the required contribution conditions satisfied. Section 40A(7) generally disallows gratuity provisions, but preserves qualifying provisions, and Explanation 2 makes such deduction available in the year of provision without waiting for actual payment. The distinction between initial liability and incremental liability was treated as irrelevant after section 40A(7), so the departmental restriction on deduction failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>