<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (8) TMI 164 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69925</link>
    <description>Incentive wages paid to workmen for higher production, attendance, discipline and improved industrial relations were treated as business expenditure on commercial expediency and not as bonus. The payment arose under an agreement with the workmen and was linked to a percentage of earnings, not to the company&#039;s profits. On that basis, the disallowance was set aside and the deduction claim was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:13:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (8) TMI 164 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69925</link>
      <description>Incentive wages paid to workmen for higher production, attendance, discipline and improved industrial relations were treated as business expenditure on commercial expediency and not as bonus. The payment arose under an agreement with the workmen and was linked to a percentage of earnings, not to the company&#039;s profits. On that basis, the disallowance was set aside and the deduction claim was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>