<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (12) TMI 97 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69923</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, condoning the delay in filing due to exceptional circumstances. It held that the Commissioner lacked jurisdiction to revise the assessment under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, emphasizing that matters already decided by the Appellate Authority should not be disturbed. The Tribunal rejected the Commissioner&#039;s attempt to set aside the order and directed a fresh assessment, affirming the importance of limiting revisionary powers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:09:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (12) TMI 97 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69923</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, condoning the delay in filing due to exceptional circumstances. It held that the Commissioner lacked jurisdiction to revise the assessment under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, emphasizing that matters already decided by the Appellate Authority should not be disturbed. The Tribunal rejected the Commissioner&#039;s attempt to set aside the order and directed a fresh assessment, affirming the importance of limiting revisionary powers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>