<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 379 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69914</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals by the assessee, confirming the penalty levied under section 271(1)(c). It held that Explanation 5 to section 271(1)(c) was not applicable as there was no search under section 132, and the disclosure of income by the assessee was not deemed voluntary. The Tribunal emphasized that fiscal statutes must be strictly construed, and the disclosure made under the constraint of potential adverse action by the tax authorities could not be considered voluntary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 379 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69914</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals by the assessee, confirming the penalty levied under section 271(1)(c). It held that Explanation 5 to section 271(1)(c) was not applicable as there was no search under section 132, and the disclosure of income by the assessee was not deemed voluntary. The Tribunal emphasized that fiscal statutes must be strictly construed, and the disclosure made under the constraint of potential adverse action by the tax authorities could not be considered voluntary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>