<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 490 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69913</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection. It confirmed that non-compete fees qualify as intangible assets eligible for depreciation under Section 32(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment, finding it justified under Section 148, and confirmed the treatment of non-compete fees as capital expenditure, aligning with the jurisdictional HC&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2024 11:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 490 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69913</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection. It confirmed that non-compete fees qualify as intangible assets eligible for depreciation under Section 32(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment, finding it justified under Section 148, and confirmed the treatment of non-compete fees as capital expenditure, aligning with the jurisdictional HC&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>