<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 313 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69910</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) that the notice issued under section 148 was invalid due to exceeding the statutory time limit of six years. It was clarified that the High Court&#039;s order did not amount to a direction for reopening the assessment but merely enabled the Assessing Officer to issue a fresh notice if permissible by law. The revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 16:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 313 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69910</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) that the notice issued under section 148 was invalid due to exceeding the statutory time limit of six years. It was clarified that the High Court&#039;s order did not amount to a direction for reopening the assessment but merely enabled the Assessing Officer to issue a fresh notice if permissible by law. The revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>