<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 229 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69892</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the revenue&#039;s appeals, determining that the reopening of assessments under Section 147 was valid and not in violation of Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It concluded that the proviso to Section 14A did not apply to deductions under Chapter VI-A. The case was remanded to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision on merits, emphasizing the necessity for a hearing for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2024 18:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 229 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69892</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the revenue&#039;s appeals, determining that the reopening of assessments under Section 147 was valid and not in violation of Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It concluded that the proviso to Section 14A did not apply to deductions under Chapter VI-A. The case was remanded to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision on merits, emphasizing the necessity for a hearing for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69892</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>