<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 355 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69890</link>
    <description>Issue 1: The tribunal upheld the decision to treat interest income from fixed deposits as &#039;Income from other sources&#039; rather than business income, as the deposits were not directly linked to the business activities.Issue 2: The tribunal rejected the deduction under section 80HHC before setting off brought forward losses, following the precedence that section 80AB takes precedence over other sections in Chapter VI-A.Issue 3: The tribunal ruled that interest income from specific companies was not considered business income as the transactions were not part of a continuous money-lending business, leading to dismissal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 18:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 355 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69890</link>
      <description>Issue 1: The tribunal upheld the decision to treat interest income from fixed deposits as &#039;Income from other sources&#039; rather than business income, as the deposits were not directly linked to the business activities.Issue 2: The tribunal rejected the deduction under section 80HHC before setting off brought forward losses, following the precedence that section 80AB takes precedence over other sections in Chapter VI-A.Issue 3: The tribunal ruled that interest income from specific companies was not considered business income as the transactions were not part of a continuous money-lending business, leading to dismissal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>