<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (3) TMI 219 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69868</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s decision to disallow certain agricultural development expenses claimed by the assessee under section 35C of the IT Act for the assessment year 1981-82. Despite the assessee&#039;s arguments on jurisdictional and limitation issues, including the contention that the assessment order merged with the first appellate authority&#039;s order, the Tribunal relied on legal precedents to support the CIT&#039;s invocation of powers under section 263 and the validity of the revision order passed beyond the specified time frame. The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the lack of consensus among High Courts on the doctrine of merger.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:00:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (3) TMI 219 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69868</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s decision to disallow certain agricultural development expenses claimed by the assessee under section 35C of the IT Act for the assessment year 1981-82. Despite the assessee&#039;s arguments on jurisdictional and limitation issues, including the contention that the assessment order merged with the first appellate authority&#039;s order, the Tribunal relied on legal precedents to support the CIT&#039;s invocation of powers under section 263 and the validity of the revision order passed beyond the specified time frame. The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the lack of consensus among High Courts on the doctrine of merger.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>