<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (12) TMI 172 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69865</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that sales commission and sales discount, as common trade practices, do not qualify as sales promotion expenses under s. 37(3A) of the ITA, 1961. It differentiated between general promotional activities and transaction-specific expenses, ruling in favor of the assessee. The tribunal reinstated the Assessing Officers&#039; orders, overturning the CIT&#039;s decisions under s. 263 and allowing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 14:55:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (12) TMI 172 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69865</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that sales commission and sales discount, as common trade practices, do not qualify as sales promotion expenses under s. 37(3A) of the ITA, 1961. It differentiated between general promotional activities and transaction-specific expenses, ruling in favor of the assessee. The tribunal reinstated the Assessing Officers&#039; orders, overturning the CIT&#039;s decisions under s. 263 and allowing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>