<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 254 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69857</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and remitted the matter back to the Assessing Officer for reevaluation of the claim under section 35D, holding that the issue was debatable and could not be disallowed under section 154. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a fresh examination of the applicability of section 35D, in line with the majority opinion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 14:07:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 254 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69857</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and remitted the matter back to the Assessing Officer for reevaluation of the claim under section 35D, holding that the issue was debatable and could not be disallowed under section 154. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a fresh examination of the applicability of section 35D, in line with the majority opinion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>