<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (6) TMI 84 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69851</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that there was no concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars regarding the sale of timber. It was found that the assessee had disclosed the timber sale in the return of income and could have reasonably believed the proceeds were not subject to capital gains tax. As a result, the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was canceled, and the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:45:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (6) TMI 84 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69851</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that there was no concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars regarding the sale of timber. It was found that the assessee had disclosed the timber sale in the return of income and could have reasonably believed the proceeds were not subject to capital gains tax. As a result, the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was canceled, and the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>