<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (7) TMI 190 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69850</link>
    <description>Departmental circulars on extra shift allowance bind officers where a concern as a whole worked double or triple shifts, and the allowance was upheld without machine-wise counting. Payments made under a binding settlement with workers, even if described as incentive or ex gratia and paid over bonus, were treated as deductible business expenditure because they arose from a binding labour obligation. Damages for delayed Employees State Insurance remittance were allowed as revenue deduction where the delay was explained and the amount was not in substance a penalty. Interest for delayed assessment completion could be reduced on the statutory scheme, and the appellate authority could require the assessing officer to consider relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:40:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (7) TMI 190 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69850</link>
      <description>Departmental circulars on extra shift allowance bind officers where a concern as a whole worked double or triple shifts, and the allowance was upheld without machine-wise counting. Payments made under a binding settlement with workers, even if described as incentive or ex gratia and paid over bonus, were treated as deductible business expenditure because they arose from a binding labour obligation. Damages for delayed Employees State Insurance remittance were allowed as revenue deduction where the delay was explained and the amount was not in substance a penalty. Interest for delayed assessment completion could be reduced on the statutory scheme, and the appellate authority could require the assessing officer to consider relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>