<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (9) TMI 139 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69849</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the husband&#039;s technical and professional knowledge and experience, which justified the salary payment made by the assessee. The conflict between s. 40A(2) and s. 64(1)(ii) was noted, with the Tribunal ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee based on the specific circumstances and qualifications of the husband.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:35:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (9) TMI 139 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69849</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the husband&#039;s technical and professional knowledge and experience, which justified the salary payment made by the assessee. The conflict between s. 40A(2) and s. 64(1)(ii) was noted, with the Tribunal ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee based on the specific circumstances and qualifications of the husband.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>