<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (4) TMI 137 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69848</link>
    <description>Ginning was treated as a manufacturing operation because the Tribunal followed a binding High Court ruling on the point. On that basis, the earlier finding that the assessee was not engaged in manufacture or production could not stand. The assessee&#039;s entitlement to relief under sections 80J, 80HH and 32A was therefore required to be worked out in accordance with law, treating ginning as a manufacturing process and considering the relevant attendant circumstances. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:31:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (4) TMI 137 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69848</link>
      <description>Ginning was treated as a manufacturing operation because the Tribunal followed a binding High Court ruling on the point. On that basis, the earlier finding that the assessee was not engaged in manufacture or production could not stand. The assessee&#039;s entitlement to relief under sections 80J, 80HH and 32A was therefore required to be worked out in accordance with law, treating ginning as a manufacturing process and considering the relevant attendant circumstances. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>