<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (3) TMI 195 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69839</link>
    <description>Omission to consider and discuss a prior binding or relevant order of the same Bench on the same issue can constitute a mistake apparent from the record. In these circumstances, the Tribunal treated that omission as sufficient to justify rectification, set aside the impugned appellate orders, and directed that the appeals be restored and posted for fresh hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:59:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (3) TMI 195 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69839</link>
      <description>Omission to consider and discuss a prior binding or relevant order of the same Bench on the same issue can constitute a mistake apparent from the record. In these circumstances, the Tribunal treated that omission as sufficient to justify rectification, set aside the impugned appellate orders, and directed that the appeals be restored and posted for fresh hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69839</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>