<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (1) TMI 162 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69835</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the remuneration received by the partner in a firm should be treated as a special share of profits, not eligible for standard deduction under s. 16(i) of the IT Act, 1961. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the orders of the authorities and rejecting the contention that the remuneration should be considered as salary entitled to standard deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:52:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (1) TMI 162 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69835</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the remuneration received by the partner in a firm should be treated as a special share of profits, not eligible for standard deduction under s. 16(i) of the IT Act, 1961. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the orders of the authorities and rejecting the contention that the remuneration should be considered as salary entitled to standard deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69835</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>