<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (7) TMI 142 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69822</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that deductions should be allowed separately for income from different employments under the head &#039;Salaries.&#039; The Tribunal rejected the Income Tax Officer&#039;s contention that only one consolidated deduction is admissible, emphasizing that each item enumerated in Section 17(1) represents salary. Drawing an analogy to computing income under the head &#039;profits and gains of the business,&#039; the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order, affirming the separate computation of income for different employments. The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal and affirmed the decision to allow deductions separately for income from different employments under the head &#039;Salaries.&#039;</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:25:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (7) TMI 142 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69822</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that deductions should be allowed separately for income from different employments under the head &#039;Salaries.&#039; The Tribunal rejected the Income Tax Officer&#039;s contention that only one consolidated deduction is admissible, emphasizing that each item enumerated in Section 17(1) represents salary. Drawing an analogy to computing income under the head &#039;profits and gains of the business,&#039; the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order, affirming the separate computation of income for different employments. The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal and affirmed the decision to allow deductions separately for income from different employments under the head &#039;Salaries.&#039;</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>