https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69809 The Tribunal rectified its previous order by acknowledging the oversight in not considering the depreciation claim for windmills at Perungudi and Kethanur. The issue was remanded back to the CIT(A) for specific findings. The disallowance of depreciation for windmills at Mandvi was upheld. The Tribunal's order was amended to reflect these changes, and the appeal was partly allowed. en-us Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:00:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69809 The Tribunal rectified its previous order by acknowledging the oversight in not considering the depreciation claim for windmills at Perungudi and Kethanur. The issue was remanded back to the CIT(A) for specific findings. The disallowance of depreciation for windmills at Mandvi was upheld. The Tribunal's order was amended to reflect these changes, and the appeal was partly allowed. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69809