<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (6) TMI 96 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69804</link>
    <description>Addition to the trading account under the proviso to section 145(1) was held unjustified because the sales-tax based turnover enhancement had already been deleted and the gross profit rate applied was excessive in light of past results and increased turnover; the trading addition was deleted. Cash credits of Rs. 11,000 were held not satisfactorily explained under section 68 because the assessee failed to establish the creditor&#039;s source of funds, capacity to advance the money, or supporting evidence of the alleged commission business; the addition was sustained. The stated principle is that acceptance of a cash credit requires proof of the creditor&#039;s identity, capacity, and the genuineness of the transaction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:50:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (6) TMI 96 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69804</link>
      <description>Addition to the trading account under the proviso to section 145(1) was held unjustified because the sales-tax based turnover enhancement had already been deleted and the gross profit rate applied was excessive in light of past results and increased turnover; the trading addition was deleted. Cash credits of Rs. 11,000 were held not satisfactorily explained under section 68 because the assessee failed to establish the creditor&#039;s source of funds, capacity to advance the money, or supporting evidence of the alleged commission business; the addition was sustained. The stated principle is that acceptance of a cash credit requires proof of the creditor&#039;s identity, capacity, and the genuineness of the transaction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>