<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (9) TMI 150 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69789</link>
    <description>Income accruing to a deceased person&#039;s undivided estate after death was held assessable as a single estate under section 168 in the hands of the person actually administering it. The provision was treated as covering not only an executor but also an administrator or any other person administering the estate, so formal letters of administration were not necessary where one heir managed the estate with the consent of the others. The representative-assessment scheme in sections 160 to 164 was distinct, and section 26 did not apply once section 168 governed the estate. Separate inclusion of fractional shares in the individual assessments of the heirs was therefore not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:59:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (9) TMI 150 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69789</link>
      <description>Income accruing to a deceased person&#039;s undivided estate after death was held assessable as a single estate under section 168 in the hands of the person actually administering it. The provision was treated as covering not only an executor but also an administrator or any other person administering the estate, so formal letters of administration were not necessary where one heir managed the estate with the consent of the others. The representative-assessment scheme in sections 160 to 164 was distinct, and section 26 did not apply once section 168 governed the estate. Separate inclusion of fractional shares in the individual assessments of the heirs was therefore not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>