<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (4) TMI 203 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69759</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dismissed the appeals, upholding the Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s decision regarding the genuineness of commission payments and compliance with legal provisions. The ITAT emphasized the need for concrete evidence and found no violation of the Companies Act or Income Tax Act, noting the legitimate business relationship between the company and agencies. The judgment underscores the importance of substantiating claims and evaluating payments based on the parties&#039; obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:00:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (4) TMI 203 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69759</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dismissed the appeals, upholding the Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s decision regarding the genuineness of commission payments and compliance with legal provisions. The ITAT emphasized the need for concrete evidence and found no violation of the Companies Act or Income Tax Act, noting the legitimate business relationship between the company and agencies. The judgment underscores the importance of substantiating claims and evaluating payments based on the parties&#039; obligations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>