<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (3) TMI 161 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69734</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, confirming the penalty imposed by the IAC under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, 1961. The decision emphasized the systematic suppression of income by the assessee, upheld the jurisdiction of the IAC, and found the evidence supporting the penalty to be sufficient.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:49:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (3) TMI 161 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69734</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, confirming the penalty imposed by the IAC under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, 1961. The decision emphasized the systematic suppression of income by the assessee, upheld the jurisdiction of the IAC, and found the evidence supporting the penalty to be sufficient.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>