<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (9) TMI 111 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69710</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT MADRAS-B allowed the appeal regarding the allowance of development rebate for an offset machine installed on 30th March, 1975. Despite the Commissioner&#039;s contention of lack of evidence of usage in the accounting period, the Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s explanation of the machine being used on specific dates. It considered the definition of &quot;installed&quot; machinery and lack of reasons for non-usage, leading to the restoration of the development rebate initially allowed by the Income Tax Officer. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence to disregard the claim of machinery usage, resulting in a favorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 16:47:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (9) TMI 111 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69710</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT MADRAS-B allowed the appeal regarding the allowance of development rebate for an offset machine installed on 30th March, 1975. Despite the Commissioner&#039;s contention of lack of evidence of usage in the accounting period, the Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s explanation of the machine being used on specific dates. It considered the definition of &quot;installed&quot; machinery and lack of reasons for non-usage, leading to the restoration of the development rebate initially allowed by the Income Tax Officer. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence to disregard the claim of machinery usage, resulting in a favorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>