<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (7) TMI 164 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69701</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras-B upheld the decision to delete a sum of Rs. 26,667 from the deceased&#039;s estate valuation under s. 9 of the Estate Duty Act. The Tribunal determined that the transaction involving the deceased surrendering interest in a firm to his sister&#039;s son did not qualify as an immediate gift under the Act due to the commercial nature and lack of gifting elements. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming that the transaction did not meet the criteria for a gift under the Estate Duty Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 16:28:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (7) TMI 164 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69701</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras-B upheld the decision to delete a sum of Rs. 26,667 from the deceased&#039;s estate valuation under s. 9 of the Estate Duty Act. The Tribunal determined that the transaction involving the deceased surrendering interest in a firm to his sister&#039;s son did not qualify as an immediate gift under the Act due to the commercial nature and lack of gifting elements. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming that the transaction did not meet the criteria for a gift under the Estate Duty Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>