<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (2) TMI 129 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69700</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s deletions of additions for deficiency in gross profit and unexplained credits under the head &quot;other sources,&quot; as well as the disallowance of interest payments. However, the Tribunal reversed the AAC&#039;s direction regarding the charging of interest under Section 217, stating that the AAC was not justified in modifying the interest charge. The appeals were allowed in part and dismissed in part accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 16:26:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (2) TMI 129 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69700</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s deletions of additions for deficiency in gross profit and unexplained credits under the head &quot;other sources,&quot; as well as the disallowance of interest payments. However, the Tribunal reversed the AAC&#039;s direction regarding the charging of interest under Section 217, stating that the AAC was not justified in modifying the interest charge. The appeals were allowed in part and dismissed in part accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>