<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (4) TMI 69 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69689</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT MADRAS-B consolidated two appeals by the department regarding the assessment years 1973-74 and 1974-75. The case involved an individual proprietor claiming exemption under section 5(1)(xxxi) of the Wealth Tax Act for assets of an industrial undertaking. The dispute centered on whether the business, engaged in the manufacture and sale of lint and cotton seeds, qualified as a manufacturing concern for exemption purposes. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that as long as the business was involved in manufacturing or processing goods, it constituted an industrial undertaking, entitling the assessee to the exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:54:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (4) TMI 69 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69689</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT MADRAS-B consolidated two appeals by the department regarding the assessment years 1973-74 and 1974-75. The case involved an individual proprietor claiming exemption under section 5(1)(xxxi) of the Wealth Tax Act for assets of an industrial undertaking. The dispute centered on whether the business, engaged in the manufacture and sale of lint and cotton seeds, qualified as a manufacturing concern for exemption purposes. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that as long as the business was involved in manufacturing or processing goods, it constituted an industrial undertaking, entitling the assessee to the exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>