<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (8) TMI 81 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69681</link>
    <description>Net wealth valuation required the right to receive rent to be valued at its market value on the valuation date, not automatically at the full face amount, where the rent had become irrecoverable due to tenant trouble and eviction. The write-off was treated as a valuation issue for the receivable itself, not as a bad debt deduction claim. A representative&#039;s apparent consent did not justify assessment at the full amount if the legal valuation principle pointed otherwise. The addition of the entire amount was not sustained, and the matter was remitted for fresh determination of the market value and consequential reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:27:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (8) TMI 81 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69681</link>
      <description>Net wealth valuation required the right to receive rent to be valued at its market value on the valuation date, not automatically at the full face amount, where the rent had become irrecoverable due to tenant trouble and eviction. The write-off was treated as a valuation issue for the receivable itself, not as a bad debt deduction claim. A representative&#039;s apparent consent did not justify assessment at the full amount if the legal valuation principle pointed otherwise. The addition of the entire amount was not sustained, and the matter was remitted for fresh determination of the market value and consequential reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>