<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 358 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69662</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the cancellation of the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer. It found that the amendment to Section 140A(1) had prospective operation, hence no requirement for the assessee to pay self-assessment tax before filing the return. Moreover, the Tribunal accepted the reasonable cause for non-payment of tax, leading to the conclusion that no penalty under Section 221(1) was justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 358 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69662</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the cancellation of the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer. It found that the amendment to Section 140A(1) had prospective operation, hence no requirement for the assessee to pay self-assessment tax before filing the return. Moreover, the Tribunal accepted the reasonable cause for non-payment of tax, leading to the conclusion that no penalty under Section 221(1) was justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>