<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 321 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69661</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessing authority&#039;s imposition of a surcharge over the tax levied under section 113 of the Income-tax Act, citing the validity of the Finance Act, 2001, which prescribed a 17% surcharge. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing that the Finance Act&#039;s provisions on surcharge were constitutionally valid under Article 271 of the Constitution of India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 14:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 321 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69661</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessing authority&#039;s imposition of a surcharge over the tax levied under section 113 of the Income-tax Act, citing the validity of the Finance Act, 2001, which prescribed a 17% surcharge. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing that the Finance Act&#039;s provisions on surcharge were constitutionally valid under Article 271 of the Constitution of India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69661</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>