<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 280 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69660</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the incentive from the underwriter on TNPL shares was a capital receipt, not taxable income. However, it disallowed deductions for construction projects and contributions to the Tamil Nadu Basketball Association due to insufficient business nexus. The claim under section 80HHC was also denied, as the necessary details were not submitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 13:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 280 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69660</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the incentive from the underwriter on TNPL shares was a capital receipt, not taxable income. However, it disallowed deductions for construction projects and contributions to the Tamil Nadu Basketball Association due to insufficient business nexus. The claim under section 80HHC was also denied, as the necessary details were not submitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>