<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (2) TMI 212 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69633</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the amendment to Section 40 of the Finance Act, 1983, extending exemption to buildings used for employee residences without salary restrictions, should be applied prospectively from the amendment date, not retrospectively. The appellant&#039;s claim for retrospective application was dismissed, and the decision favored the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (2) TMI 212 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69633</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the amendment to Section 40 of the Finance Act, 1983, extending exemption to buildings used for employee residences without salary restrictions, should be applied prospectively from the amendment date, not retrospectively. The appellant&#039;s claim for retrospective application was dismissed, and the decision favored the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69633</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>