<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (10) TMI 149 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69614</link>
    <description>The Tribunal denied the investment allowance under section 32A for the projector, allied equipment, and air-conditioning equipment in a cinema theatre. It held that the exhibition of cinematograph films did not constitute the manufacture or production of any article or thing as required by the Act. The Tribunal emphasized that the projection of films only created temporary mental impressions and did not meet the criteria for investment allowance. Additionally, it ruled out the argument that the exhibition of films involved the generation of power, stating that passing high-velocity arc rays through films did not qualify as power generation under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 10:43:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (10) TMI 149 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69614</link>
      <description>The Tribunal denied the investment allowance under section 32A for the projector, allied equipment, and air-conditioning equipment in a cinema theatre. It held that the exhibition of cinematograph films did not constitute the manufacture or production of any article or thing as required by the Act. The Tribunal emphasized that the projection of films only created temporary mental impressions and did not meet the criteria for investment allowance. Additionally, it ruled out the argument that the exhibition of films involved the generation of power, stating that passing high-velocity arc rays through films did not qualify as power generation under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69614</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>