<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (6) TMI 60 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69610</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the assessee was not entitled to a deduction under section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 1986-87. The court ruled that the premium on export license, export subsidy, and duty drawback were not profits derived from the export business and thus could not be included in the calculation of export profits for the purpose of the deduction. As the assessee did not meet the conditions for the deduction, it was rightfully denied based on the precedent and interpretation of the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 10:29:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (6) TMI 60 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69610</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the assessee was not entitled to a deduction under section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 1986-87. The court ruled that the premium on export license, export subsidy, and duty drawback were not profits derived from the export business and thus could not be included in the calculation of export profits for the purpose of the deduction. As the assessee did not meet the conditions for the deduction, it was rightfully denied based on the precedent and interpretation of the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>