<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (1) TMI 166 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69588</link>
    <description>The appeals filed by the assessee for the assessment years 1977-78 to 1982-83 were dismissed. However, for the assessment years 1983-84 and 1984-85, the Tribunal allowed the appeals in part. The claim for weighted deductions under Section 35C of the IT Act was denied, while the disallowance of the provision for Molasses Storage Fund was overturned. Additionally, the amount shown as Excise Duty relief was deemed non-assessable for the assessment year 1984-85.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:54:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (1) TMI 166 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69588</link>
      <description>The appeals filed by the assessee for the assessment years 1977-78 to 1982-83 were dismissed. However, for the assessment years 1983-84 and 1984-85, the Tribunal allowed the appeals in part. The claim for weighted deductions under Section 35C of the IT Act was denied, while the disallowance of the provision for Molasses Storage Fund was overturned. Additionally, the amount shown as Excise Duty relief was deemed non-assessable for the assessment year 1984-85.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>