<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (12) TMI 92 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69572</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(Appeals) decision, ruling that the Income Tax Officer cannot substitute market value for closing stock agreed upon in dissolution accounts unless the partners&#039; agreement is proven to be mala fide. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering the true principle of legal decisions and confirmed that revaluation of assets, particularly closing stock, was unwarranted in this case, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:00:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (12) TMI 92 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69572</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(Appeals) decision, ruling that the Income Tax Officer cannot substitute market value for closing stock agreed upon in dissolution accounts unless the partners&#039; agreement is proven to be mala fide. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering the true principle of legal decisions and confirmed that revaluation of assets, particularly closing stock, was unwarranted in this case, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>