<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (8) TMI 144 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69568</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the deduction of bad debts for the assessment year 1985-86, finding the write-off to be bona fide. However, the investment allowance for the computer purchase was denied as it was deemed ineligible under section 32A. The computation of relief under section 80HHC for export profits was permitted based on identifiable profits, with directions to verify overhead expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 16:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (8) TMI 144 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69568</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the deduction of bad debts for the assessment year 1985-86, finding the write-off to be bona fide. However, the investment allowance for the computer purchase was denied as it was deemed ineligible under section 32A. The computation of relief under section 80HHC for export profits was permitted based on identifiable profits, with directions to verify overhead expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>