<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (8) TMI 215 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69545</link>
    <description>A debt write-off against trust assets was treated as a commercial recovery decision, not a deemed gift, where the trustees and creditor accepted sale proceeds in full satisfaction after the trust property had declined in value and yielded no further income. The analysis notes that continuing to wait for the original deferred sale period would have been impracticable and potentially harmful to beneficiaries, so the balance written off was not an abandonment without consideration under the Gift-tax Act. A separate write-off of a debt already barred by limitation was also regarded as a proper accounting act because the amount was no longer legally recoverable, and no taxable deemed gift arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 15:22:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (8) TMI 215 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69545</link>
      <description>A debt write-off against trust assets was treated as a commercial recovery decision, not a deemed gift, where the trustees and creditor accepted sale proceeds in full satisfaction after the trust property had declined in value and yielded no further income. The analysis notes that continuing to wait for the original deferred sale period would have been impracticable and potentially harmful to beneficiaries, so the balance written off was not an abandonment without consideration under the Gift-tax Act. A separate write-off of a debt already barred by limitation was also regarded as a proper accounting act because the amount was no longer legally recoverable, and no taxable deemed gift arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>