<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (1) TMI 140 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69540</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for the assessment year 1983-84 and dismissed the appeal for the assessment year 1984-85. The disallowance of interest paid to partners under section 40(b) was not upheld, citing the clarificatory nature of the explanation introduced by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1984. Additionally, discrepancies in stock valuation were not deemed sufficient for ad hoc additions, leading to the deletion of such additions for both assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 15:12:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107901" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (1) TMI 140 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69540</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for the assessment year 1983-84 and dismissed the appeal for the assessment year 1984-85. The disallowance of interest paid to partners under section 40(b) was not upheld, citing the clarificatory nature of the explanation introduced by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1984. Additionally, discrepancies in stock valuation were not deemed sufficient for ad hoc additions, leading to the deletion of such additions for both assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>