<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (4) TMI 127 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69516</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that receipts from horse racing activities were not taxable as income since they were considered incidental to a hobby pursued for pleasure, not profit. The Tribunal ruled that capital gains from the sale of horses should not be taxed as the horses were deemed personal effects, not capital assets. The ITO was directed to recompute taxable income, excluding income from leasing or selling horses, and considering only stake money and betting winnings. The appeal was allowed, setting aside previous orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (4) TMI 127 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69516</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that receipts from horse racing activities were not taxable as income since they were considered incidental to a hobby pursued for pleasure, not profit. The Tribunal ruled that capital gains from the sale of horses should not be taxed as the horses were deemed personal effects, not capital assets. The ITO was directed to recompute taxable income, excluding income from leasing or selling horses, and considering only stake money and betting winnings. The appeal was allowed, setting aside previous orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69516</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>