<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (9) TMI 165 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69509</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee is entitled to a weighted deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act for the commission paid to State Trading Corporation (STC). The services provided by STC were deemed comprehensive and essential to the export process, meeting the criteria for the deduction. The Tribunal rejected departmental appeals, confirming that the CBDT circular applies to the assessee&#039;s case and distinguishing the Madras High Court decision that was found inapplicable to the present circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 13:59:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (9) TMI 165 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69509</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee is entitled to a weighted deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act for the commission paid to State Trading Corporation (STC). The services provided by STC were deemed comprehensive and essential to the export process, meeting the criteria for the deduction. The Tribunal rejected departmental appeals, confirming that the CBDT circular applies to the assessee&#039;s case and distinguishing the Madras High Court decision that was found inapplicable to the present circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>