<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (9) TMI 164 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69508</link>
    <description>Jewellery presented by a father to his daughter on her marriage was treated as marriage expenditure rather than a taxable gift. The analysis applied Hindu law principles recognising a daughter&#039;s right to reasonable marriage expenses out of family resources, so the expenditure was not a voluntary transfer in the sense required for gift-tax. The nature of the jewellery, whether ancestral or purchased, and any community custom were considered immaterial. A payment made in discharge of a legal obligation and supported by consideration in money or money&#039;s worth falls outside the statutory definition of a gift, and the marriage-related jewellery expenditure was therefore excluded from gift-tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 13:56:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (9) TMI 164 - ITAT MADRAS-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69508</link>
      <description>Jewellery presented by a father to his daughter on her marriage was treated as marriage expenditure rather than a taxable gift. The analysis applied Hindu law principles recognising a daughter&#039;s right to reasonable marriage expenses out of family resources, so the expenditure was not a voluntary transfer in the sense required for gift-tax. The nature of the jewellery, whether ancestral or purchased, and any community custom were considered immaterial. A payment made in discharge of a legal obligation and supported by consideration in money or money&#039;s worth falls outside the statutory definition of a gift, and the marriage-related jewellery expenditure was therefore excluded from gift-tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>