<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 333 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69475</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by the assessees for statistical purposes, highlighting the importance of procedural fairness and adherence to legal principles in tax assessments. The case involved a dispute over the determination of long-term capital gain under section 50C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the opportunity for the assessee to challenge the valuation by the stamp valuation authority. The Tribunal emphasized the specific nature of section 50C in determining consideration in property transfers and upheld the assessee&#039;s right to challenge valuation discrepancies, remitting the case back to the Assessing Officer for re-examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 11:33:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 333 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69475</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by the assessees for statistical purposes, highlighting the importance of procedural fairness and adherence to legal principles in tax assessments. The case involved a dispute over the determination of long-term capital gain under section 50C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the opportunity for the assessee to challenge the valuation by the stamp valuation authority. The Tribunal emphasized the specific nature of section 50C in determining consideration in property transfers and upheld the assessee&#039;s right to challenge valuation discrepancies, remitting the case back to the Assessing Officer for re-examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>