<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 264 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69448</link>
    <description>The ITAT concluded that the amendment by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004, was prospective, not affecting the assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05. It directed the AO to grant a pro rata deduction under Section 80-IB(10) for residential units, excluding the commercial area. The assessee&#039;s appeals were partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 17:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 264 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69448</link>
      <description>The ITAT concluded that the amendment by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004, was prospective, not affecting the assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05. It directed the AO to grant a pro rata deduction under Section 80-IB(10) for residential units, excluding the commercial area. The assessee&#039;s appeals were partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>