<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 282 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69445</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that 90% of gross receipts such as interest, commission, brokerage, rent, charges, etc., should be excluded from business profits for computing the deduction under s. 80HHC. The appeals by the Revenue were allowed, confirming this exclusion. Other appeals were remanded to the AO to determine if interest income was business income or from other sources for appropriate exclusions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 18:25:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 282 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69445</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that 90% of gross receipts such as interest, commission, brokerage, rent, charges, etc., should be excluded from business profits for computing the deduction under s. 80HHC. The appeals by the Revenue were allowed, confirming this exclusion. Other appeals were remanded to the AO to determine if interest income was business income or from other sources for appropriate exclusions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>