<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 247 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69441</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal partly, concluding that the appellant was not obligated to pay advance tax on the refund adjustment received after the last instalment date. The Tribunal held that the liability to pay interest under Section 234C arises only on income foreseeable by the assessee at the given time, and income from unforeseen events is not subject to advance tax before occurrence. Therefore, the appeal was allowed on this issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 247 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69441</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal partly, concluding that the appellant was not obligated to pay advance tax on the refund adjustment received after the last instalment date. The Tribunal held that the liability to pay interest under Section 234C arises only on income foreseeable by the assessee at the given time, and income from unforeseen events is not subject to advance tax before occurrence. Therefore, the appeal was allowed on this issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>