<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 176 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69438</link>
    <description>The ITAT MADRAS-A upheld the disallowance of Rs. 6,35,640 as a capital loss, not a revenue loss, for the advance written off by the assessee for the construction of a cold storage plant. Regarding PF and ESI contributions made at the end of the assessment year, the tribunal directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to adjudicate the issue, allowing the assessee an opportunity to be heard. The appeal was partly allowed, restoring the issue of PF and ESI contributions for further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 20:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 176 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69438</link>
      <description>The ITAT MADRAS-A upheld the disallowance of Rs. 6,35,640 as a capital loss, not a revenue loss, for the advance written off by the assessee for the construction of a cold storage plant. Regarding PF and ESI contributions made at the end of the assessment year, the tribunal directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to adjudicate the issue, allowing the assessee an opportunity to be heard. The appeal was partly allowed, restoring the issue of PF and ESI contributions for further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>