<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 175 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69437</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, allowing the assessee&#039;s cross-objections on jurisdictional grounds. It held the reopening of assessment under Section 147 as unjustified due to a change of opinion and deemed the reassessment proceedings invalid for non-service of notice under Section 143(2). The Tribunal classified the non-compete fee as a capital receipt, not taxable as goodwill, and ruled the technical know-how receipt as non-taxable for the assessment year 1997-98. It directed verification of TDS credits and ascertained liabilities for discounts. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on book profit computation, following the Supreme Court&#039;s precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2024 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 175 - ITAT MADRAS-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69437</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, allowing the assessee&#039;s cross-objections on jurisdictional grounds. It held the reopening of assessment under Section 147 as unjustified due to a change of opinion and deemed the reassessment proceedings invalid for non-service of notice under Section 143(2). The Tribunal classified the non-compete fee as a capital receipt, not taxable as goodwill, and ruled the technical know-how receipt as non-taxable for the assessment year 1997-98. It directed verification of TDS credits and ascertained liabilities for discounts. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on book profit computation, following the Supreme Court&#039;s precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=69437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>